|
Federal Study on Nurse Staffing in
Nursing Facilities
Background: The
Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS), overseen
by the Secretary of Health and Human Services, currently
requires that each nursing facility provide 8 hours of care
by a registered nurse and 24 hours of coverage by a licensed
nurse per day. This regulation is the same for all nursing
homes – regardless of the size of the facility or the number
of residents it serves. For over a decade, Congress has
asked the Secretary of Health and Human Services to report
on establishing minimum caregiver to resident ratios and
supervisor to caregiver ratios. Phase I of a report on nurse
staffing ratios in nursing homes was released in July of
2000; Phase II was presented to Congress in March of 2002.
Purpose: This
two-part federal study was designed to determine if nurse
staffing ratios are appropriate and, if appropriate, to
examine the cost and feasibility of minimum ratio
requirements. Researchers were charged with seeking ratios
to attain good or optimal quality outcomes as opposed to bad
outcomes. In the first phase of the study, it was concluded
that there are critical ratios of nurses to residents below
which nursing home residents are at increased risk for
quality problems. In the second phase of the study,
researchers replicated the prior analyses with newer and
better quality data, through focus groups, surveys and
interviews at over 5,000 facilities in 10 states.
Key Finding: The
Phase II Report, released in March of 2002, identified 4.08
hours of nursing care per resident per day as the threshold
necessary to "improve outcomes and avoid selected problems"
in long-term care residents. The total of 4.08 hours
includes 2.78 hours per day of care by nursing assistants
for each resident and 1.3 hours per day by licensed staff
(including .75 from an R.N.) for each resident. It was noted
that after these staffing thresholds are met, further
increases in staffing would not be expected to add to
quality.
The measures used by researchers to
examine quality for long-stay residents involved five
changes in health or behavioral status often cited in the
scientific literature as related to staffing. Those measures
included: activities of daily living (e.g., eating,
dressing, toileting, bathing, walking etc); pressure ulcers;
skin trauma (e.g., bruises, burns, cuts, skin tears); weight
loss; and, resistance to assistance with activities of daily
living.
Related Findings:
In addition to increasing numbers of staff, retaining staff
was identified as a critical factor in enhancing quality.
High turnover/low retention was found to negatively affect
quality of care for several reasons:
- familiarity with the resident and
his/her needs is lessened
- continuity of care is compromised
and vulnerable residents who do not cope well with
change may decline
- turnover breeds additional
turnover as staff feel overworked and lose morale.
Recruitment/Retention Efforts:
Management practices and training for nursing staff provide
opportunities to improve staffing. Specific suggestions
include:
Positive management practices are associated with
improved retention. According to researchers, best
practices include:
- Clear and fair guidelines for
staff
- Resources to allow easy
implementation of standards
- Consistent follow-up and
enforcement of standards by supervisors
- A culture which stresses
respect and value of caregivers
- Willingness to delegate
responsibility and hold staff and managers
accountable
- Interest in spending time on
the floor.
-
Training: A commitment to ongoing training was
identified as a critical factor in both recruiting and
retaining staff. Points of consideration:
- More than 75 hours of
training is necessary to give students time to absorb
material covered in the classroom and increase clinical
training
- Soft-skills such as
communication, problem-solving, and cultural sensitivity
must be added to curriculum requirements
- Career ladders, peer mentors,
and support systems enhance the professionalism of
nurses and provide opportunities for growth
- Linkages with community
colleges, private schools, and other community-based
trainers help ensure smooth transitions between
classroom lessons and application to the nursing home.
Cost:
The increased demand for nurses resulting from
implementation of minimum staffing ratios would necessitate
compensation increases between 2.5% and 7% for R.N.’s and
between 10% and 22% (e.g. 86 cents to $1.89 per hour) for
nurse aides. While acknowledging that these increases are
substantial, the federal report nevertheless suggests "they
are not so high as to preclude the possibility of
implementing thresholds."
Next Steps:
Two areas were identified by the federal staffing study as
leading to improvement in nurse staffing – developing a
reliable public reporting system of nurse staffing
information and completing an analysis of costs/benefits
associates with higher staffing. Effective January 1, 2003
all nursing home facilities will be required to post "in a
clearly visible place" the number of nursing staff available
on each shift.
Related Studies:
The positive relationship between nurse staffing and quality
of nursing home care has been identified in studies by the
Institute of Medicine in 1996 and 2001 and in a report to
the U. S. Health Care Financing Administration by Dr.
Charlene Harrington of the University of California, San
Francisco in 2000.
Minnesota Staffing Patterns
Background:
Minnesota requires 2 hours of nursing care per resident per
day – less than half of the 4.08 standard recommended in the
federal study – and less than the 3.9 hours per resident per
day currently reported as actual practice across the
country. A review of January 2003 data from the Centers for
Medicare and Medicaid shows that the state of Minnesota is
in the bottom eight per cent of states in the average number
of hours of nursing care provided per resident per day:
- Average for the U.S. = 3.9 hours
per resident per day;
- Average for 46 states = 3.4 hours
or higher;
- Average for Minnesota and Iowa =
3.3 hours per resident per day;
- Average for Rhode Island and South
Dakota = 3.2 hours per day
The 2001 Minnesota legislature
mandated that a time study be conducted to determine whether
staffing patterns are adequate for "providing quality care
based on professional best practice and consumer
experience." That study, originally mandated for completion
by January 15, 2003, is now anticipated on January 15, 2004.
Review of Staffing Data: In
partial fulfillment of requirements for a M.S. degree from
Minnesota State University, Mankato, Jennifer Preus compared
Minnesota averages to federal recommendations in the summer
of 2002. Using the Nursing Home Compare website as a tool,
charts were created presenting information for each
Minnesota nursing facility. Each home was identified as a
Boarding Care Home, Nursing Home Connected to a Hospital, or
a Stand-Alone Nursing Facility, permitting analysis
according to type of home.
When comparing ratios of individual
Minnesota facilities with the ratios suggested by the
federal staffing study, Ms. Preus reported that ninety-two
percent of Minnesota facilities fell below recommended
levels while eight percent of Minnesota facilities were
found to staff at or above recommended levels.
Ombudsman Follow-Up: With
the implementation of the federal requirement that nursing
facilities post staffing information beginning on January 1,
2003, ombudsmen staff and volunteers will:
- Monitor staffing patterns and
correlate that data with issues raised on a
facility-by-facility basis by residents and families;
- Encourage consumers to inquire
about staffing patterns and to observe staff interaction
with residents (see tips which follow)
The State Ombudsman will participate
in the advisory committee charged with overseeing the
development of the time study report to the legislature due
on January 15, 2004 referenced in the background section.
Tips for Consumers: The
National Citizens’ Coalition for Nursing Home Reform Guide
for Residents, Families and Caregivers suggests that
families "trust your senses" of smell, taste, touch, hearing
and sight to get a read on whether a facility has enough
staff to provide quality care.
Questions to consider include:
- Does the staff respond promptly to call lights or
calls for help?
- Are residents taken to the toilet when they ask or
want to go?
- Have staff worked at the facility long enough to call
residents by name?
- Are residents helped and encouraged to drink at
mealtimes? Are they offered something to drink between mealtimes?
- Are residents up and dressed and groomed every day?
- Does the home look and smell clean?
- Do staff spend time talking with residents?
- Have the Administrator and Director of Nursing been at
the facility for over a year?
- Do residents seem relaxed and generally content?
- Do nursing assistants
- Feel they have enough time to provide good care?
- Say they have a licensed nurse available to help
when needed?
- Feel they have a choice about working overtime?
|